On Friday night I went to see Joe Strummer: The Future is Unwritten at MIFF. It was well attended, and I saw some well known Melbourne faces in the audience, including film director Ana Kokkinos and art gallery owner Helen Gory.
Director Julian Temple (documentor of the Sex Pistols in The Great Rock ‘n’ Roll Swindle and The Filth and the Fury) introduced the film and answered questions afterwards. According to Temple, Joe Strummer “hated Tony Blair not just because he was a cunt but because he was a destroyer of freedom”. Punk lives.
The film is beautifully made, with extensive use of animated versions of Strummer’s drawings and lyric sheets, lots of The Clash archival images, and also lots of general archival film. This is integrated into the story in such as way that at times you don’t know whether it is a Strummer home movie or something else. It also uses a lot of classic film sequences to illustrate themes, such as sequences from the animated Animal Farm. It’s fast, clever and amusing.
Temple interviews the usual bandmates, ex girlfriends and others around large campfires at various locations, and we learn that Strummer enjoyed camping, including at Glastonbury, and loved the intimacy of communicating around a campfire. What is annoying, however, it that there are no captions, and sometimes the context does not make it clear who the person is or what their connection to Strummer is.
Some of the people interviewed are very curious. Bono, for example, is entirely suitable, although pompous, because he tells of seeing The Clash - his first big concert - in Dublin when he was 17, and how inspirational it was. Bono is interviewed alone at his own campfire, and Temple explained after the film that this was done “because Bono thinks he’s god”. Hilarious.
Other interviewees are curious simply for their presence. Johnny Depp in Captain Sparrow beard, for example, and other Hollywood and New York film luminaries. Depp says nothing of significance. Temple admits their inclusion was all about money - their general popularity helps ensure international sales as people will presumably go to a documentary about a relatively unknown topic if they know it has some more famous faces in it.
When I saw Scott Walker: 30th Century Man the night before, director Stephen Kijak said exactly the same thing about including a brief interview with Sting. David Bowie was naturally interviewed as he is known as a Walker fan and has covered his songs. Brian Eno is a fellow experimental music pioneer and has wise and worthwhile opinions. Sting? He secured a sale of the documentary in Japan, according to Kijak, because he is so popular there.
I understand the desperation of filmmakers to get films financed, made and seen. For Kijak, making a relatively low budget doco about an obscure topic, compromises are probably necessary. But for such a famous director as Temple, making a doco about a much better known musician, to have to adopt the same tactics is troubling. I want to end on a happy note. I was not expecting to see Temple at the film and it was exciting to hear him speak.