skank is as skank does
Brunswick St women’s fashion shop IDS commissioned artist Deb some time ago to paint some of her signature female figures on their shop door and doorway. On a recent weekend walk I noticed that someone had added to her work and I am not sure how I feel about it.
One way to see it is to be annoyed because this is bad for the business that paid for Deb’s work. However, it’s not a stupid tag and cannot immediately be dismissed as worthless vandalism. Where does creative license begin and end? When is commentary like this justified and when is it inappropriate or disrespectful to the artist? More importantly, is the critique aimed at the clothes, the customers or the art?
You might also like
|
|
|
|
Other posts you may find relevant and interesting
- the Salvos on a Monday morning, 6 April 2009
- Fitzroy art criticism, 13 January 2009
- new work by Phibs and Deb on Rose St, 19 August 2009
- I’m not half the man I used to be, 2 July 2010
- a conspiracy of criticism, 29 January 2009
November 22nd, 2008 at 5:25 pm
Is this work considered graffiti? If so, I don’t think the addition is disrespectful.
This has prompted some thoughts on graffiti art in general. I love graffiti art. I love strolling through the city and viewing graffiti art. Now I see graffiti artists shifting into galleries and for me it takes the art out of context. I don’t love it as much when I see it in a gallery. For me I no longer consider it as graffiti art, its just art. So now I am confused. Is the objective then only to make money? What does the word graffiti mean, what is the criteria? Personally, part of the rush of seeing a new fabulous work on a wall, is because it’s in the public domain, its accessible, it mingles with the other works to become almost a collaborative piece. In a gallery it stands alone and with a price tag. It can therefore be purchased and never seen again by the public.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
June 23rd, 2009 at 10:33 pm
Its deffinately an immature act of jealousy, Debs work is everywhere and mostly well respected. She is an amazing artist, I met her recently at one of her shows and she is one of the nicest people I’ve ever met. I am a big fan of her work. I think the one that tagged over it is deffinately the skank. You can always tell when something is an act of jealousy and in this case most deffinately. Big Up Deb! Always lookin out for new stuff.
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
November 13th, 2009 at 2:07 am
amber, in alot of cases, artists start of sketching painting or drawing before they move onto graff. graff is a passion for me but i have been painting since i was young so i see what your saying BUT sometimes you are willing to sell some of your work to beable to fund painting on the street. you do realise a can of paint is 8-12 bucks and you only fund that out of your own pocket if you never sell a piece of artwork. also seeing it in a gallery context is simply another take on the art its good to have a balance of both. i hope you begin to understand where we are coming from as graffers who exhibit, a lot of people see it as selling out but its one of those things…if you really dont understand maybe you shouldnt comment.
as for this, every single time a girl comes on the graff scene there is this sort of disrespect and i definately think its jealousy most probably from other girls who wish they could have the balls and the talent to do it.
Like or Dislike:
1 
1