About Fitzroyalty

Fitzroyalty - hyperlocal news and reviews about Melbourne’s first suburb: Fitzroy 3065 - is a local news and reviews site for Fitzroy residents and visitors. Read the about and hyperlocal pages for more information.

It features stories on the suburb of Fitzroy in Melbourne, Australia, and reflections on life from a socially libertarian, economically socialist, culturally anarchistic and radically individualistic point of view.

"I hate almost everything you write yet I cannot look away. You’re better than [Andrew] Bolt." User comment.

You can also email the author at brian [at] indolentdandy.net.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
Fitzroyalty - a hyperlocal blog about Melbourne’s first suburb: Fitzroy 3065 by Brian Ward is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Australia License.

Subscribe to feeds

GeoRSS enabled RSS2 and Atom feeds are available for you to syndicate as per the CC license.

All posts GeoRSS RSS2

All posts GeoRSS Atom

Comments (not GeoRSS enabled)

Note: I have removed my full feed as of July 2009 due to its misuse by some commercial aggregators in breach of my Creative Commons license. An excerpt feed is provided.

Recent comments

Recently updated posts

Archives

Meggs, Rone, Sutton gallery and the Yarra council

One night in January artists Meggs and Rone completed a joint pasteup on the prominent Brunswick St wall of the Sutton gallery. I did not get to see it as it had been removed by Yarra City Council cleaners by the time I next walked that way. The photos used in this story are from Meggs’ Flickr account and are used with his permission. Thanks Meggs – I hope I don’t annoy you with what I want to say. While I generally like street art and think that a degree of leniency in terms of the law is sometimes appropriate, this instance is complicated and I want to consider the different points of view about it.

brunswick st

Photo by Meggs – used with permission

brunswick st

Photo by Meggs (detail) – used with permission

Soon after these photos were taken (it is not clear how much time passed), cleaners arrived and removed the work. Meggs comments on the photo below that:

“This building was pretty thrashed but I guess ours was the straw that broke the camel’s back. They won’t allow street frontage like that unless you pay them for it!!”

In subsequent comments responding to my questions, Meggs indicates that he is referring to advertising in public spaces, from which he believes the council profits. I do not know if this is correct.

brunswick st

Photo by Meggs – used with permission

If the artists knew the council would react by quickly cleaning up this prominent space then I have to question why they chose to use it. Deliberately wasting the council’s time and the ratepayers’ money by placing work where it will be immediately removed is frustrating and unnecessary.

Did the gallery complain to the council? Did they want it removed? Did the council remove the work because of its location, regardless of what the property owner wanted? Was it necessary for the work to be removed? Did the council overreact?

In many instances street art (in the eyes of many people) improves public space. How difficult is it for a street artist to decide which spaces to use? I understand that part of the thrill is in installing work late at night in unauthorised locations while dodging the Police.

What obligation do artists, who are also members of the local community (I believe several prominent Melbourne street artists live in Fitzroy), have to other members of the community in not wasting the rates they pay to the council by not forcing the council to send in the cleaners?

Can the council do more to identify appropriate (albeit unauthorised) spaces for artists to use, and communicate more with property owners and artists to facilitate this? The Yarra council has detailed graffiti policy information on their website, but much of the focus is legal rather than social. The graffiti management policy (88kb PDF) dates from 2004 and does not even mention paste-ups as a form of graffiti.

There are legitimate reasons to limit the locations where illegal graffiti (of the artistic kind, not tags) is tolerated, and Fitzroy has many de facto streets where it is not removed. Either the property owners don’t care or they condone the work. Many more private buildings contain legal commissioned works.

A policy that decriminalises certain spaces and encourages them to be use for art, not tags, may be worth considering. Better communication between all parties would be required for this to happen. I’d like to start the conversation here. What do you have to say?

Similar or related posts


old and new Rone on Gore St
Since September when I previously posted about this fading Rone work on Gore St it gained some lippy,...

Neverfresh on Rose St
I've previously posted on Rone's fantastic collage of faces on Rose St, and after a few months of wind,...

it’s all about the glue
Rone's current Rose St wall paste-up has not lasted as well or for as long as his previous work on the...

Other posts you may find relevant and interesting

6 Responses to “Meggs, Rone, Sutton gallery and the Yarra council”

  1. TRES Says:

    The reason it was cleaned off is because too many people were walking past the gallery and assuming it was advertising for a show for meggs. The gallery were constantly turning away disapointed punters.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. brian Says:

    Interesting! I didn’t think that Sutton gallery exhibited this kind of work. If they were receiving lots of interest, perhaps they could consider it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. flav Says:

    not interesting! sutton is one of australias best galleries, and they know their stuff. for them, this stuff obviously didn’t make the grade.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. TRES Says:

    You would be interested to know flav, that a lot of Melbourne’s top fine artists’ have a background in graffiti, with some still active in the graffiti community. And I don’t mean nice paste up’s etc, I mean real graffiti. Their is even some in the Sutton stable!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. brian Says:

    So you recognise a difference between tagging and other forms of graffiti art?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. TRES Says:

    No I don’t, they go hand in hand. You will find many of your personal posterboy’s of the street art scene including Phibs and Dabs, are regular practitioner’s of tagging and do it very well too. I was trying to distinguish between various degrees of graffiti writers/street artists. There are those that concentrate on one form, like posters and there are those that are very active in all facets of graffiti including tagging. The latter are those I was referring to.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

You own the copyright of your comment. By submitting your comment you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.