About Fitzroyalty

Fitzroyalty - hyperlocal news and reviews about Melbourne’s first suburb: Fitzroy 3065 - is a local news site for Fitzroy residents and visitors. Read the about and hyperlocal pages for more information.

It features stories on the suburb of Fitzroy in Melbourne, Australia, and reflections on life from a socially libertarian, economically socialist, culturally anarchistic and radically individualistic point of view.

"I hate almost everything you write yet I cannot look away. You’re better than [Andrew] Bolt." User comment.

You can also email the author at brian [at] indolentdandy.net.

Copyright license

Creative Commons License
Fitzroyalty - a hyperlocal blog about Melbourne’s first suburb: Fitzroy 3065 by Brian Ward is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Australia License.

Subscribe to feeds

GeoRSS enabled RSS2 and Atom feeds are available for you to syndicate as per the CC license.

All posts GeoRSS RSS2

All posts GeoRSS Atom

Comments (not GeoRSS enabled)

Note: I have removed my full feed as of July 2009 due to its misuse by some commercial aggregators in breach of my Creative Commons license. An excerpt feed is provided.

Recent comments

Recently updated posts

Archives

common sense, discrimination and human rights

We live in an age of rampant hypocrisy. Rich suits in their private old man clubs receive exemptions from anti-discrimination laws and are free to exclude women, but a woman who wants to run a travel business that excludes men from group trips is banned from doing so. Some forms of sexism are apparently better than others.

In the aftermath of the terrible death of Dianne Brimble, cruise ship operators are trying to be more socially responsible and want to end the bogan drug fueled gang bang culture that seems to prevail amongst some of their customers. But when they try to stop schoolies from booking trips because they are a liability due to their stupid drunken behaviour, they are not allowed to. A belated sense of social responsibility should be encouraged, but in this case harm reduction is less important than the freedom to be a moron.

The Victorian government provides funding for a religious conference but refuses funding for an atheist conference. So far this situation has not been tested by the Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. Does the Victorian government have the right to discriminate against non believers?

No individual needs the services of businesses or (unless they are own shares in them) can demonstrate a sense of ownership over them, and so they cannot expect to influence their behaviour or business models. If one club or travel provider won’t let you in, try another. End of story. They lose your money and suffer the consequences of the public reaction if their behaviour is considered discriminatory.

The difference between private businesses and the government is that we, as citizens and taxpayers, appoint the government to represent us, and we have a direct interest in and ownership of their decisions, particularly when it comes to spending our money collected as taxes. We supposedly live in a secular state, but when religions receive government funding, tax exemptions and other favourable treatment and atheists do not something is fundamentally wrong.

You might also like

genital mutilation
I really don't understand women much of the time. Here is a perfect example. The Age newspaper on January...
you do not own me
A teacher in NSW, Lynne Tziolas, has been dismissed from her job because she appeared nude in a magazine....
anti-gentrification (naive whinging) festival starts on Sunday
On 7 June 2010 the Age reported on an anti-gentrification festival to be held in Fitzroy starting this...

Other posts you may find relevant and interesting

6 Responses to “common sense, discrimination and human rights”

  1. Brendan Says:

    Agree 100%

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  2. Robert Says:

    I totally agree with you.

    getting back to discrimination on a local level, I would also argue that discriminatory practices are rife within the City Of Yarra.

    Namely, I am referring to the antidotal evidence I have seen suggesting that developers interests and residents interests are not teated equally.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  3. vetti Says:

    Agree…also, after this morning’s breakfast experience, I’m also most interested in finding someone who has a babycino-free, child-free Northside cafe I can frequent.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

  4. brian Says:

    Oh, asking for childfree is the last taboo! I’d like one too but I think it would be discriminatory lol…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

  5. Robert Says:

    How about dog free?
    What is it with these people who feel the need to bring a dog wheresoever they go? [..ooops!]

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  6. brian Says:

    Agreed. I’m sick of tripping over people’s dogs in inappropriate places.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

Leave a Reply

You own the copyright of your comment. By submitting your comment you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.